About

In December 2018, Stackemup Typology began to lay the groundwork for the unification of enneagram and socionics. The unification was successfully completed in 2024. Stackemup Typology presents the only valid breakdown for every type, wing, stack, socionics type and subtype.

Stackemup Typology is the first and as of 2025 only school of typology in the world that has unified two separate and distinct typologies (enneagram and socionics) as demonstrated by its 2500+ enneagram/socionics exemplars’ type list. All enneagram typings have been controlled for with socionic types. All socionics typings have been controlled for with enneagram types.

Current enneagram and socionics authors and schools of typology only utilize a one typology perspective. Current enneagram authors do not control for socionics type. This handicaps their ability to accurately type. They are missing a layer of reality. They confuse aspects of Se for the force of type 8. They confuse aspects of Ni Fe for the depth of type 4. They confuse aspects of Te Ni for competency triad. They mistype SEI 4w5s for 9w1s because they don’t understand the cooling and stabilizing features of Si-base, etc etc.

On the socionics-side, current socionics authors only utilize a one typology perspective. They do not control for enneagram type. This handicaps their ability to accurately type. They confuse aspects of type four for Ni Fe. They confuse aspects of type eight for Se . They confuse considerations of the competency triad for Te Ni. Etc etc.

Some uni-typology adherents claim that a dual typology approach corrupts their typology. However, a dual typology perspective actually preserves the typologies in a purer form. Rather than undertake the difficult task of learning a new typology from the ground up, people with a one typology perspective search for and invent novel concepts within their single typology to try and account for dissimilarities being created by the other typology. Just through unifying core enneagram with core socionics, there are no gaps that would require either the invention or utilization of fantastical concepts.