2500+ Enneagram & Socionics Exemplars
TWO TYPOLOGIES | ONE TYPE LIST
TWO TYPOLOGIES
ONE TYPE LIST
Type 2 Exemplars with Wing, Stack and Full Socionics Type
Type 3 Exemplars with Wing, Stack and Full Socionics Type
Type 4 Exemplars with Wing, Stack and Full Socionics Type
Type 5 Exemplars with Wing, Stack and Full Socionics Type
Type 6 Exemplars with Wing, Stack and Full Socionics Type
Type 7 Exemplars with Wing, Stack and Full Socionics Type
Type 8 Exemplars with Wing, Stack and Full Socionics Type
FAQ
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN STACKEMUP TYPOLOGY AND OTHER TYPOLOGY SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT?
Stackemup Typology has unified two separate and distinct typologies (enneagram and socionics) as demonstrated by my 2500+ enneagram/socionics exemplars’ type list. All enneagram typings have been controlled for with socionic concepts. All socionics typings have been controlled for with enneagram concepts.
In contrast, current enneagram authors only utilize a one typology perspective. They do not control for socionics type. This handicaps their ability to accurately type. They confuse aspects of Se Ti for the force of type 8. They confuse aspects of Ni Fe for the depth of type 4. They confuse aspects of Te Ni for compentency triad. Etc.
On the socionics-side, current socionics authors only utilize a one typology perspective. They do not control for enneagram type. This handicaps their ability to accurately type. They confuse aspects of type four for Ni Fe. They confuse aspects of type eight for Se Ti. They confuse considerations of the competency triad for Te Ni. Etc.
WHERE DOES SOCIONICS COME FROM?
WHAT IS YOUR METHOD OF TYPING?
ARE TESTS, QUIZZES AND/OR QUESTIONNAIRES A GOOD WAY FOR ME TO DISCOVER MY TYPE?
DID YOU UTILIZE TRIFIX AT ALL IN ARRIVING AT YOUR BREAKDOWN FOR EACH TYPE WING AND STACK?
WHAT ARE INSTINCTUAL STACKINGS?
WHAT IS THE ORIGIN OF INSTINCTUAL STACKINGS?
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN STACKEMUP TYPOLOGY (ENNEAGRAM-SIDE) AND RISO & HUDSON’S ENNEAGRAM?
The difference between Stackemup Typology (enneagram-side) and the R & H enneagram is that I can back my typings and ideas up with the only valid breakdown for every type, wing and stack utilizing 2500+ exemplars in both enneagram and socionics.
Russ Hudson’s view on types contradicts the theory on the centers of intelligence. Hudson posits that each type is a reactive formation to a core fear. That would make each type a fear type, so according to Hudson’s theory, gut types and image types still boil down to being fear types. This doesn’t make any sense.
ARE BOOKS NECESSARY FOR LEARNING ABOUT THE TYPES?
There are currently no authors whose work reflects the integration of a dual-typology perspective.
There are no authors who utilize a wholly different typology to serve as a control group for another typology.
CAN CHAT GPT TELL ME MY ENNEAGRAM OR SOCIONICS TYPE?
No, AI has no way of observing physiology. People can control modify and script the words they speak. However, they have no control over the ripple effect that their personality has on their physiology. Just ask ChatGPT:
“You’re correct; as an AI, I lack the capability to observe physiology and behavior directly. My assessments are based solely on the text and information provided by users, and I do not have access to non-verbal cues, body language, or other physiological data that might inform a more comprehensive understanding of an individual’s personality type.”