2500+ Enneagram & Socionics Exemplars

TWO TYPOLOGIES    |    ONE TYPE LIST

TWO TYPOLOGIES

ONE TYPE LIST

Type 2 Exemplars with Wing, Stack and Full Socionics Type

Type 3 Exemplars with Wing, Stack and Full Socionics Type

Type 4 Exemplars with Wing, Stack and Full Socionics Type

Type 5 Exemplars with Wing, Stack and Full Socionics Type

Type 6 Exemplars with Wing, Stack and Full Socionics Type

Type 7 Exemplars with Wing, Stack and Full Socionics Type

Type 8 Exemplars with Wing, Stack and Full Socionics Type

Type 9 Exemplars with Wing, Stack and Full Socionics Type

Type 1 Exemplars with Wing, Stack and Full Socionics Type

FAQ

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN STACKEMUP TYPOLOGY AND OTHER TYPOLOGY SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT?

Stackemup Typology has unified two separate and distinct typologies (enneagram and socionics) as demonstrated by my 2500+ enneagram/socionics exemplars’ type list. All enneagram typings have been controlled for with socionic concepts. All socionics typings have been controlled for with enneagram concepts.

In contrast, current enneagram authors only utilize a one typology perspective. They do not control for socionics type. This handicaps their ability to accurately type. They confuse aspects of Se Ti for the force of type 8. They confuse aspects of Ni Fe for the depth of type 4. They confuse aspects of Te Ni for compentency triad. Etc.

On the socionics-side, current socionics authors only utilize a one typology perspective. They do not control for enneagram type. This handicaps their ability to accurately type. They confuse aspects of type four for Ni Fe. They confuse aspects of type eight for Se Ti. They confuse considerations of the competency triad for Te Ni. Etc.

WHERE DOES SOCIONICS COME FROM?
Carl Jung ultimately deserves the credit for Socionics even though he is not the pioneer of model A. Ne, Ni, Se, Fi, Fe, Te, Ti are still all Jung’s functions. There is a strain in the socionics community that wants to give Aushra all the credit. This is fake socionics. Aushra did nothing significant with either Model A or the Functions. Aushra only combined Kepinski with Jung. Neither Aushra nor Aushra’s lackeys have any say over the definitions for Jung’s functions which is the driving engine of socionics. Jung published his book and these function were well-researched, well-documented and well-published longer before Aushra came along. Aushra took Jung’s functions and definitions and fit them into model A (which she got from Kepinski’s ideas). This is why “Jung, Not Aushra” is a core tenet of American Socionics – which was founded by Stackemup Typology (socionics-side).
WHAT IS YOUR METHOD OF TYPING?
My method of typing favors a non-dualistic view of personality. Because mind and body are one, personality creates a ripple effect on physiology. The sum total of these physiological markers is called gestalt. This is how type is assessed and classified.
ARE TESTS, QUIZZES AND/OR QUESTIONNAIRES A GOOD WAY FOR ME TO DISCOVER MY TYPE?
No. Tests, quizzes and questionnaires increase mistypings. Tests are flawed because tests 1) rely upon self-reporting which is tainted by ego and facilitates confirmation bias and 2) descriptions about types do not equal distinctions between types.
DID YOU UTILIZE TRIFIX AT ALL IN ARRIVING AT YOUR BREAKDOWN FOR EACH TYPE WING AND STACK?
No. Trifix and tritype are relics of the one typology perspective. Just through unifying core enneagram with core socionics, I am not left with any gaps that would require either the invention or utilization of alternative concepts.
WHAT ARE INSTINCTUAL STACKINGS?
Instinctual variants are biological drives (instincts) existing inside of the primitive brain that operate entirely independent of ego and are represented by behaviors all throughout the animal kingdom.
WHAT IS THE ORIGIN OF INSTINCTUAL STACKINGS?
While instinctual variants come from Claudio Naranjo, the stackings were first discussed and thoroughly fleshed out on the old enneagram forums – i.e. 9types.com, the eidb, and Ocean’s Moonshine. Ocean’s Moonshine Enneagram deserves the brunt of credit for first bringing stackings to the forefront of the enneagram community.
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN STACKEMUP TYPOLOGY (ENNEAGRAM-SIDE) AND RISO & HUDSON’S ENNEAGRAM?

The difference between Stackemup Typology (enneagram-side) and the R & H enneagram is that I can back my typings and ideas up with the only valid breakdown for every type, wing and stack utilizing 2500+ exemplars in both enneagram and socionics.

Russ Hudson’s view on types contradicts the theory on the centers of intelligence. Hudson posits that each type is a reactive formation to a core fear. That would make each type a fear type, so according to Hudson’s theory, gut types and image types still boil down to being fear types. This doesn’t make any sense.

ARE BOOKS NECESSARY FOR LEARNING ABOUT THE TYPES?

There are currently no authors whose work reflects the integration of a dual-typology perspective.

There are no authors who utilize a wholly different typology to serve as a control group for another typology.

CAN CHAT GPT TELL ME MY ENNEAGRAM OR SOCIONICS TYPE?

No, AI has no way of observing physiology. People can control modify and script the words they speak. However, they have no control over the ripple effect that their personality has on their physiology. Just ask ChatGPT:

“You’re correct; as an AI, I lack the capability to observe physiology and behavior directly. My assessments are based solely on the text and information provided by users, and I do not have access to non-verbal cues, body language, or other physiological data that might inform a more comprehensive understanding of an individual’s personality type.”

WHAT IS THE CORE OF EGO?
The distortions for each enneagram type constitute the core of ego.
IS TYPE INBORN OR THE RESULT OF ENVIRONMENT?
Type is inborn. There is a part of the brain, call it the “mother chip” that contains all the information of personality. Enneagram and socionics are like separate branches within that same chip.
ARE ALL ENNEAGRAM TYPES A REACTIVE FORMATION TO A CORE FEAR?
No, Types are the result of core distortions They are just following their core distortion to its logical end. The core distortion is expressed through a stable of fixed traits. Types are not a reactive formation to a core fear. That would make every type a fear type.
DO TYPES HAVE LEVELS OF HEALTH?
Theodore Millon first popularized the notion of levels of health. He didn’t call it levels of health. But he approached the DSM personality disorders as existing on a spectrum of ordered to disordered. Naranjo was then the first to incorporate that notion into the enneagram. He sought to bring the nine enneagram types into union with the DSM and the western tradition of psychology.
My cart
Your cart is empty.

Looks like you haven't made a choice yet.